follow-up: john hancock would be ashamed

on july 24^th, i posted that amazing story about the goobers who couldn't get their check signed.

at work today, i noticed a sign on the bulletin board that said: "what is wrong with this check? hint: it's more than one thing." then there was a check underneath it. immediately, i recognized that it was a check from those people i dealt with last saturday. this check also had no signature, but the driver who took it got the license number!! how do you spend a minute writing down a license number without noticing the empty signature line?

i folded the check over to see if it was signed on the back instead. it wasn't. at least i got them to sign it on the back before i told them i couldn't accept it.

best of all, the driver's initials on the check were from our very own red smurf. for those of you who don't know who red smurf is, i can't blame you. he's a contributing team member for this blog, yet he has never once contributed anything.